This requirement exists to execute approved remediation activities and monitor progress to completion and to support consistent, auditable compliance management.
Define the required corrective action implementation process, accountable roles, inputs, outputs, approval points, evidence requirements, review frequency, and escalation criteria. Integrate the activity with the organization's compliance records and related risk, policy, control, and assessment processes. A financial institution records a regulatory control failure, performs root-cause analysis, assigns corrective actions, and verifies remediation before formally closing the issue.
| FRAMEWORK CODE | FRAMEWORK NAME & DETAILS | FAMILY / CATEGORY | VERSION | ACTION |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ISO27001 | ISO/IEC 27001 ISO/IEC 27001 specifies auditable requirements for... Clause: 10.2 – Nonconformity and corrective action |
ISO
Standard
|
v2022 | View → |
| IRDAI | IRDAI Information & Cyber Security Guidelines IRDAI information and cyber-security requirements... Clause: §2.10-3.4 – Management of IS Incidents and Improvement; §1.8-V – Risk Treatment |
India
Guideline
|
vLatest | View → |
| RBI-CSF | RBI Cyber Security Framework / Master Directions RBI cyber-security requirements and directions set... Clause: Circular §5 – Identification/assessment of inherent cyber risks and controls |
India
Regulation
|
vLatest | View → |
| SEBI-CSCRF | SEBI Cyber Security & Cyber Resilience Framework SEBI’s Cybersecurity and Cyber Resilience Framewor... Clause: 1.4 GV.OV: Oversight; 1.1 GV.OC: Organizational Context |
India
Regulation
|
vLatest | View → |
| DORA | Digital Operational Resilience Act The EU Digital Operational Resilience Act establis... Clause: Article 6(7) – Formal follow-up and timely remediation of critical ICT audit findings |
EU
Regulation
|
vCurrent | View → |
| ISO27002 | ISO/IEC 27002 ISO/IEC 27002 is a guidance standard containing a... Clause: 5.36 – Compliance with policies, rules and standards for information security |
ISO
Standard
|
v2022 | View → |
| NIS2 | NIS2 Directive The NIS2 Directive establishes EU-wide cybersecuri... Clause: Article 21(4) – Corrective measures where the entity does not comply with Article 21(2) measures |
EU
Directive
|
vCurrent | View → |
| COBIT2019 | COBIT COBIT is an enterprise governance and management f... Clause: 4.5 – Monitor, Evaluate and Assess (MEA) > MEA03 – Managed Compliance with External Requirements > MEA03.04 – Obtain assurance of external compliance. |
COBIT
Governance Framework
|
v2019 | View → |
| ISO22301 | ISO/IEC 22301 ISO 22301 specifies requirements for a Business Co... Clause: 10.1 – Nonconformity and corrective action |
ISO
Standard
|
v2019 | View → |
| NIST-CSF | NIST Cybersecurity Framework (CSF) The NIST Cybersecurity Framework provides high-lev... Clause: ID.IM – Improvement | ID.IM-01 – Improvements are identified from evaluations |
NIST
Framework
|
v2 | View → |
| NIST80053 | NIST SP 800-53 NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 presents control families, i... Clause: 3.4 – ASSESSMENT, AUTHORIZATION, AND MONITORING, 3.13 – PROGRAM MANAGEMENT; CA-5 – PLAN OF ACTION AND MILESTONES, PM-4 – PLAN OF ACTION AND MILESTONES PROCESS |
NIST
Control Catalog
|
vRev. 5 | View → |
| SOC2 | SOC 2 Trust Services Criteria SOC 2 is an independent examination and reporting... Clause: CC4.2 – Monitoring of Controls – COSO Principle 17: The entity evaluates and communicates internal control deficiencies in a timely manner to those parties responsible for taking corrective action, including senior management and the board of directors, as appropriate. |
AICPA
Audit Framework
|
vLatest | View → |